Both Injective and Ethereum serve as platforms for decentralized applications, but they differ significantly.

• Speed: Injective processes transactions much faster due to its Tendermint consensus.
• Fees: Near-zero transaction fees compared to Ethereum’s higher gas costs.
• Interoperability: Injective natively supports IBC and Ethereum bridges, while Ethereum requires third-party solutions.
• Order Book Model: Injective offers decentralized order books, while Ethereum relies heavily on AMMs.

Conclusion: Ethereum remains a general-purpose platform, while Injective specializes in financial applications with high efficiency.